eceee  

Everyday life energy-related innovations in the harsh light of social reality: turning energy efficiency policy foundations upside down? (1-414-13)

Sylvie Douzou , EDF R&D, France
Sophie Bouly de Lesdain, EDF-R&D, France

This is a peer-reviewed paper.

Keywords

user perspective, behavioural change, broader social context, case studies, consumption dynamics, end-use demand, everyday life, sociology, anthropology, socio-technical, policy-making, demand-side management, agency, households practices, energy efficiency

Abstract

Home energy related innovations constitute the cornerstone of most scenarios and visions of the future underpinning energy efficiency policies for the residential sector. Not without reason: the ambitious targets declared may necessarily be achieved partly through the integration of a sophisticated set of possible socio-technical innovations – but only under certain conditions. Such projections remain (at least in part) "stories" of possible futures. These narratives will eventually become reality only on the condition that these "socio-technical promises" find their place and meaning in the social system for which they are intended. In addition, they will achieve their objectives only on the condition that the ways in which they will be incorporated into social practices will lead to better management of energy uses. This is obviously not always the case. A recent example of such a “failure” is the EU’s Energy Efficiency (EE) Directive which the European Commission admitted will not achieve its ambitious targets by 2020 but only half, according to the latest estimates (Gierulski 2012).
In this paper, we argue that such views - often too strictly normative - do not stand up to the analysis of real conditions of insertion/co-evolution innovations which are indeed deeply anchored in a particular historical, social and evolving context of a given society. Home energy-related innovations are indeed hybrid and co-shaped devices resulting from an intertwined process of innovation and social incorporation. To this effect, we will first question the way current European policies are formulated, as well as their main underlying assumptions illustrated by such notions as “social acceptability” and will argue in favour of a move towards broader and more suitable approaches. Secondly, we will present an overview of two French case studies focusing on the “reception” processes of policies and related measures. We will then present some of their key findings by adopting the point of view of end-users. We will finally open up the discussion about how we might (should?) conceive and develop different energy related policies in order to make them more efficient and impactful.


Download files

Download this presentation as pdf: 1-414-13_Douzou_pre.pdf

Download this paper as pdf: 1-414-13_Douzou.pdf


Panels of the eceee 2013 Summer Study:

Panel 1. Foundations of future energy policy

Panel 2. Energy efficiency policies: What delivers?

Panel 3. Local action and national examples

Panel 4. Transport and mobility: How to deliver energy efficiency

Panel 5B. Cutting the energy use of buildings: Policy and programmes

Panel 6. Appliances, product policy and ICT

Panel 7. Monitoring and evaluation

Panel 8. Dynamics of consumption

Panel 5A. Cutting the energy use of buildings: Projects and technologies


eceee 2013 Summer Study start page

Proceedings start page

Industrial Efficiency 2016 partners